1 June 2018
SJI released its second report on the practice of female genital mutilation in Dagestan on 1 June 2018
The second report, "The practice of female gential mutilation in Dagestan: strategies for its elimination," presents the results of further unique field research about the attitude of men to the practice, in general as well as in regard to their own wives, daughters or other female relatives.
6 March 2018
In the context of the 2008 armed conflict between Russia and Georgia, SJI submitted dozens of applications to the European Court, the majority of which concern alleged serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law committed by the Russian Federation. The remaining applications concern alleged violations committed by Georgia, or jointly by Georgia and the Russian Federation.
26 December 2017
Our lawyers submitted 25 applications to the ECHR in 2017. As in the past, most of the applications concerned violation of the right to life. We submitted 13 applications on behalf of 49 applicants who have suffered as a result of extra-judicial executions or forced disappearances.
11 December 2017
The application Tatayev and others vs the Russian Federation was submitted to the ECHR in 2015 with the help of Justice Initiative. “Wild garlic picking in these districts is a difficult and dangerous job but people had no choice but to take up this occupation for lack of any other livelihood”, said lawyer Tanzila Arsamakova, who works with Justice Initiative. “The applicants and their relatives who were killed all had the necessary permits from the village administration to collect wild garlic in this location. They had been engaged in this work for some time now. The authorities simply had to have known that around 100 civilians were in the forest, but they nonetheless gave the order to fire indiscriminately on the forest from machine guns and grenade launchers”.
29 November 2017
On November 24 2017, the European Court of Human Rights communicated the application of Ingushetia resident Asya Gubasheva, filed on May 19 2017. Gubasheva’s complaint is about non-enforcement of a court decision giving her custody of her daughter (Article 8) and lack of legal protection (Article 13). The Russian bailiffs’ inaction has meant that Gubasheva has not seen her daughter for more than three years now. The ECHR recognized the mother and her four-year-old daughter as applicants.